This is the first thing napa tourist see when entering Vallejo.

I have seen people bringing food to them. That is not helping the situation!

Broadway & Couch St..SW. Garbage & 2 Squatters camps in from the street. What a horrible site to see driving down Couch St from Broadway!! You can't miss the mess!!

Illegal campsite/shanty location 38.125710, -122.258336 (gps co-ordinates). This is on a spit of land that projects into the wetlands between Sereno and Redwood, west of Sonoma. The closest business would be Hwy 29 Healthcare or Picknicky's Sandwich/MetroPCS building.

BTW, I wanted to thank you for putting up this great website, and thank as well the DPW workers who remove hundreds of tons of trash each year from Vallejo's parks, streets, waterfronts. We citizens are deeply in your debt.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This was posted nearly 10 months ago, has had 1,765 views & is still open/ unresolved?

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

From City Manager's bi-weekly update online (http://www.ci.vallejo.ca.us/city_hall/departments___divisions/city_manager/bi-_weekly_reports), looks like City Hall's concern is "environmental justice". (See Wikipedia definition.)

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

AGREED !

I don't understand why comments that are on-topic & neither obscene nor inflammatory are being blocked by rejections.

I think the purpose of this site is to report issues and report progress resolving those issues. Political speech, commentary on social issues and such are not the domain of this site. There are plenty of other forums for your discussion of those matters.

Thanks, Mr. English. Well, none of my comments were blocked. But I was wondering why yours and Mr. Batman's were. You are probably correct about the site's purpose, but I thought what was being discussed was indeed "progress resolving those issues".

Resolution of this mammoth problem in Vallejo should be addressed here i.e., notifying elected officiials @ City Hall included.. They are our employees, & many of us are unable to get to Council mtgs or meet with the civil servants!

Well said, Mr. or Ms. Anonymous. I find SCF heartening because it shows how many really do care about our city. Ordinary persons can't have much impact globally or nationally, but surely should have a workable means of impacting locally.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

Thank you for reporting! This has been forwarded to the California Northern Railroad representatives for handling, as these tracks are privately owned by them. If you would like to follow-up, you may visit: http://www.gwrr.com/about_us/contact_us for their contact information. Thank you for using SeeClickFix!

CORRECTION: The correct link for contact information is as follows: https://www.gwrr.com/operations/railroads/north_america/california_northern_railroad#ContactInformation. Thanks again for using SeeClickFix!

Unfortunately, the more sophisticated among the homeless are very adept at manipulating jurisdictional boundaries, knowing just how to place themselves outside the reach of city or county officials.

With regard to some of the other residents commenting on this thread having their "Contents blocked by rejections", I have tried to find a "terms of use" for Vallejo SCF. Could an authorized representative kindly provide those rules? Otherwise, it seems we should look to the guidelines provided by the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution , Article I, section 1 of the California Constitution & related case law. Thank you so much.

Agreed!!

SeeClickFix monitors and removes comments based on their User Agreement (http://legal.seeclickfix.com/terms-of-use/). Comments are flagged by another user and then reviewed by SeeClickFix before being removed. No municipality or agency that uses SeeClickFix has the ability to delete or modify comments made on SeeClickFix, including our own (which is a huge hassle when we accidentally misspell a word!). Hope this helps!

Thank you for your comment. Only SeeClickFix has the authority to block content. Please refer to their rules at https://seeclickfix.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/205815189-Flagging-an-Issue-or-Comment. Thanks again for using SeeClickFix!

Thank you both for your explanations. Much appreciated! I hope I don't get blocked for saying that I think the moderators need a little more training on what is & isn't protected speech. Perhaps they should consult an attorney. Also, I hope the flaggers and moderators will note that if someone's comments are blocked, a subsequent visitor seeing that might easily think the person had said something really terrible when in fact it was very mild. That unfairly damages the person's reputation. Also there is no means of flagging the unfair flagger, so it isn't a level playing field. Still SCF can be a big help, so I'm glad Vallejo is using it.